Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/ A Blog about Search and Online Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:17:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-11192 robwatts Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:31:08 +0000 http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-11192 Andrew - that is the current accepted pearl of wisdom. That said, search engineers like to mix things up and obfuscate. Noindex, follow says don't index these pages but follow the links. We could always test, but it mightn't be worth the aggravation! Andrew – that is the current accepted pearl of wisdom. That said, search engineers like to mix things up and obfuscate. Noindex, follow says don’t index these pages but follow the links. We could always test, but it mightn’t be worth the aggravation!

]]> Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-11190 Andrew Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:11:53 +0000 http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-11190 Thanks, I've always wondered about this. Namely I wanted to noindex my archive pages but I do not want to stop the pagerank flow since they are the only way to reach my posts (homepage > archives > posts) - Blogger sucks in a way that they don't have categories, and labels are forbidden in robots.txt. So I was wondering if NOINDEX,FOLLOW wouldn't show pages in Google SERPs but still follow links and more importantly, pass PageRank from homepage to posts via noindex,follow archives. Thanks, I’ve always wondered about this. Namely I wanted to noindex my archive pages but I do not want to stop the pagerank flow since they are the only way to reach my posts (homepage > archives > posts) – Blogger sucks in a way that they don’t have categories, and labels are forbidden in robots.txt.

So I was wondering if NOINDEX,FOLLOW wouldn’t show pages in Google SERPs but still follow links and more importantly, pass PageRank from homepage to posts via noindex,follow archives.

]]> Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9919 Link Frenzy: Google Related Articles Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:47:09 +0000 http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9919 [...] Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations [...] [...] Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations [...]

]]> Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9889 kulak estetigi Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:02:01 +0000 http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9889 I think a plugin in that is highly underrated is Andy Beard’s NoFollow Those Dupes Plugin. May be the reason is, not as widely used as it should be because of the lack of understanding of how it works. It gets rid of outbound dublicated links. http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes I think a plugin in that is highly underrated is Andy Beard’s NoFollow Those Dupes Plugin. May be the reason is, not as widely used as it should be because of the lack of understanding of how it works. It gets rid of outbound dublicated links. http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes

]]> Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9886 robwatts Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:04:55 +0000 http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9886 Daron - some search engines say that you shouldn't link to bad neighbourhoods. I guess we should take that on board; besides, why would anyone want to link to crap anyways? Daron – some search engines say that you shouldn’t link to bad neighbourhoods. I guess we should take that on board; besides, why would anyone want to link to crap anyways?

]]>