<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/</link>
	<description>A Search Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-11192</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 20:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-11192</guid>
		<description>Andrew - that is the current accepted pearl of wisdom. That said, search engineers like to mix things up and obfuscate. Noindex, follow says don&#039;t index these pages but follow the links. We could always test, but it mightn&#039;t be worth the aggravation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew &#8211; that is the current accepted pearl of wisdom. That said, search engineers like to mix things up and obfuscate. Noindex, follow says don&#8217;t index these pages but follow the links. We could always test, but it mightn&#8217;t be worth the aggravation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-11190</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 12:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-11190</guid>
		<description>Thanks, I&#039;ve always wondered about this. Namely I wanted to noindex my archive pages but I do not want to stop the pagerank flow since they are the only way to reach my posts (homepage &gt; archives &gt; posts) - Blogger sucks in a way that they don&#039;t have categories, and labels are forbidden in robots.txt.

 So I was wondering if NOINDEX,FOLLOW wouldn&#039;t show pages in Google SERPs but still follow links and more importantly, pass PageRank from homepage to posts via noindex,follow archives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, I&#8217;ve always wondered about this. Namely I wanted to noindex my archive pages but I do not want to stop the pagerank flow since they are the only way to reach my posts (homepage &gt; archives &gt; posts) &#8211; Blogger sucks in a way that they don&#8217;t have categories, and labels are forbidden in robots.txt.</p>
<p> So I was wondering if NOINDEX,FOLLOW wouldn&#8217;t show pages in Google SERPs but still follow links and more importantly, pass PageRank from homepage to posts via noindex,follow archives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9919</link>
		<dc:creator>Link Frenzy: Google Related Articles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 17:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9919</guid>
		<description>[...] Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] WordPress Pagerank flow considerations [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9889</link>
		<dc:creator>kulak estetigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9889</guid>
		<description>I think a plugin in that is highly underrated is Andy Beard’s NoFollow Those Dupes Plugin. May be the reason is, not as widely used as it should be because of the lack of understanding of how it works. It gets rid of outbound dublicated links. http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a plugin in that is highly underrated is Andy Beard’s NoFollow Those Dupes Plugin. May be the reason is, not as widely used as it should be because of the lack of understanding of how it works. It gets rid of outbound dublicated links. <a href="http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes" rel="nofollow">http://andybeard.eu/wordpress-plugins/nofollow-those-dupes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9886</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 06:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9886</guid>
		<description>Daron - some search engines say that you shouldn&#039;t link to bad neighbourhoods. I guess we should take that on board; besides, why would anyone want to link to crap anyways?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daron &#8211; some search engines say that you shouldn&#8217;t link to bad neighbourhoods. I guess we should take that on board; besides, why would anyone want to link to crap anyways?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9884</link>
		<dc:creator>Daron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9884</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s news to me.  Thanks.  I&#039;m sure I&#039;ll see big improvements using your ideas.  If I allow a link to a crappy site, though, will mine get worse, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s news to me.  Thanks.  I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll see big improvements using your ideas.  If I allow a link to a crappy site, though, will mine get worse, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9868</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9868</guid>
		<description>You are welcome, all imho of course :)

In terms of this question. In essence, link out for your users and in context. The short answer is that it helps you both.

The longer answer is a little bit more fuzzy.

It is a theoretcial fact that a link out to another site will drain away a factor of pagerank to the linked to site.

It doesnt hurt to associate your site or page with a relevant on topic page. 

If you have a page about cars and you link out to an authority on cars then you are not doing yourself or your readers a disservice. If you have the same page about cars and link out to something completely unrelated then you may not be helping your site or your readers.

There is a lot of theory and debate around various algorithms that may be at play when this is calculated, Hilltop, HITS to name but two. Search engines publish a lot of stuff around algorithms, patents etc. It all helps muddy the waters. :)

Of course, the only true way is to determine the answer is to test and compare across a multitude of pages; something which in isolation is not very easy to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are welcome, all imho of course <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>In terms of this question. In essence, link out for your users and in context. The short answer is that it helps you both.</p>
<p>The longer answer is a little bit more fuzzy.</p>
<p>It is a theoretcial fact that a link out to another site will drain away a factor of pagerank to the linked to site.</p>
<p>It doesnt hurt to associate your site or page with a relevant on topic page. </p>
<p>If you have a page about cars and you link out to an authority on cars then you are not doing yourself or your readers a disservice. If you have the same page about cars and link out to something completely unrelated then you may not be helping your site or your readers.</p>
<p>There is a lot of theory and debate around various algorithms that may be at play when this is calculated, Hilltop, HITS to name but two. Search engines publish a lot of stuff around algorithms, patents etc. It all helps muddy the waters. <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Of course, the only true way is to determine the answer is to test and compare across a multitude of pages; something which in isolation is not very easy to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Wordpress Pagerank flow considerations</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/comment-page-1/#comment-9867</link>
		<dc:creator>estetik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/#comment-9867</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much Robwatts. Very informative for me. May I ask another question. If I give a link to a site with higher google pagerank from my page (without nofollow - noindex tags) does it add points to my page?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much Robwatts. Very informative for me. May I ask another question. If I give a link to a site with higher google pagerank from my page (without nofollow &#8211; noindex tags) does it add points to my page?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.yackyack.co.uk/wordpress/wordpress-pagerank-flow-considerations/feed/ ) in 0.68943 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 7:51 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 8:51 am UTC -->
