<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/</link>
	<description>A Search Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10072</link>
		<dc:creator>Mitchell Haynes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/#comment-10072</guid>
		<description>Google spidering its own custom search results? - Yack Yack ...

Feb 25, 2008 ... Explanation of why and How the Purdue Cytometry Mail List will stop the ABUSE of COMMERCIAL Announcements..SPAM...JUNKMAIL. ...

www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own... - 76k - Similar pages 

I can Not express how thankful I am to GOOOOOOOGLE with their on going pursuit to Justice and Truth. While Most have ignored the truth Google pushes forward and won&#039;t stand down.

Because of Google there will Be CHANGE...THE wheels are in MOTION!

THANK YOU SOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH

LOVE THE NAME YACK YACK...

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGLE

                     ROCKS!

Mitchell Haynes

ps I hope people can add to get passed your spam protection.
lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google spidering its own custom search results? &#8211; Yack Yack &#8230;</p>
<p>Feb 25, 2008 &#8230; Explanation of why and How the Purdue Cytometry Mail List will stop the ABUSE of COMMERCIAL Announcements..SPAM&#8230;JUNKMAIL. &#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own.." rel="nofollow">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own..</a>. &#8211; 76k &#8211; Similar pages </p>
<p>I can Not express how thankful I am to GOOOOOOOGLE with their on going pursuit to Justice and Truth. While Most have ignored the truth Google pushes forward and won&#8217;t stand down.</p>
<p>Because of Google there will Be CHANGE&#8230;THE wheels are in MOTION!</p>
<p>THANK YOU SOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH</p>
<p>LOVE THE NAME YACK YACK&#8230;</p>
<p>GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGLE</p>
<p>                     ROCKS!</p>
<p>Mitchell Haynes</p>
<p>ps I hope people can add to get passed your spam protection.<br />
lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10025</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Mother</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/#comment-10025</guid>
		<description>@John

Certainly an interesting observation - you must do a lot of &#039;watching&#039; to notice such a trend! I&#039;m watching the footie and looking forward to the post match analysis!

Joking aside, you may have inadvertently identified why content is king given that if you give Google some decent size pages and get loads of them indexed then the chances on the big G liking something would probably increase.

I look forward to others views on your observation.

G. M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@John</p>
<p>Certainly an interesting observation &#8211; you must do a lot of &#8216;watching&#8217; to notice such a trend! I&#8217;m watching the footie and looking forward to the post match analysis!</p>
<p>Joking aside, you may have inadvertently identified why content is king given that if you give Google some decent size pages and get loads of them indexed then the chances on the big G liking something would probably increase.</p>
<p>I look forward to others views on your observation.</p>
<p>G. M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10023</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 09:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/#comment-10023</guid>
		<description>Heres a slightly different question.

I watch my page count and the keyword phrases regularly and think I see a trend. Whole chunks of my pages rotate in and out of the SERPS while I make no changes and this happens regularly enough that I think G features differnt filtered interpretations of the same result over time. There isn&#039;t enough time for G to re-index or re-analyse this many pages so I think it is like looking through filters used in various combination.

Anyone seen this kind of pattern?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heres a slightly different question.</p>
<p>I watch my page count and the keyword phrases regularly and think I see a trend. Whole chunks of my pages rotate in and out of the SERPS while I make no changes and this happens regularly enough that I think G features differnt filtered interpretations of the same result over time. There isn&#8217;t enough time for G to re-index or re-analyse this many pages so I think it is like looking through filters used in various combination.</p>
<p>Anyone seen this kind of pattern?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10021</link>
		<dc:creator>Shippuuden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/#comment-10021</guid>
		<description>lol, big G goes wild sometimes! ;p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, big G goes wild sometimes! ;p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10016</link>
		<dc:creator>ergonomic mouse guru</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/#comment-10016</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s funny that i just came across this post because just this morning i noticed this phenomenon for the first time. i was searching for the ranking of one of my client&#039;s pages and i see a google.com/coop/ result that basically contained crap content. maybe these pages got indexed by mistake? as soon as i saw this i started to think again about how quickly things can in the search engine world and how you can never see it coming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s funny that i just came across this post because just this morning i noticed this phenomenon for the first time. i was searching for the ranking of one of my client&#8217;s pages and i see a google.com/coop/ result that basically contained crap content. maybe these pages got indexed by mistake? as soon as i saw this i started to think again about how quickly things can in the search engine world and how you can never see it coming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-10010</link>
		<dc:creator>Phoenix SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 00:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/#comment-10010</guid>
		<description>When I read this kind of stuff I left scratching my head a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I read this kind of stuff I left scratching my head a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-9983</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 09:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/#comment-9983</guid>
		<description>exposedseo  - I fed Google Alerts back into Google via CARP and they declined to rank them as relevent content! Hey Ho looks like the Left and Right hand servers don&#039;t know about each other. Wonder if there is another orifice to Big G that I can insert their content into?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exposedseo  &#8211; I fed Google Alerts back into Google via CARP and they declined to rank them as relevent content! Hey Ho looks like the Left and Right hand servers don&#8217;t know about each other. Wonder if there is another orifice to Big G that I can insert their content into?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google spidering its own custom search results?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/comment-page-1/#comment-9982</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 08:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/#comment-9982</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t this another example of Google indexing previously unidexed contmnt like FORMS? Seems they now intend to index everything they can get their hands on and then only apply their own criteria to what should be kept. Basicially, if you put it on your server expect Goggle to go look at it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t this another example of Google indexing previously unidexed contmnt like FORMS? Seems they now intend to index everything they can get their hands on and then only apply their own criteria to what should be kept. Basicially, if you put it on your server expect Goggle to go look at it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.yackyack.co.uk/spam/google-spidering-its-own-custom-search-results/feed/ ) in 0.46627 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 8:09 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 9:09 am UTC -->
