Cool - This domain now has site links (not to be confused with subscribed links). A search for the phrase ‘yack yack’ returned this
Who searches for yack yack? Answer - no one, but hey - for those who are interested there are lessons to be learnt.
I’d like to know how they arrived at those titles and why too,they snipped the word SEO from the first link there, from my post entitled “SEO a waste of money?”
Ok, off for alka seltzer 
Did this help? Do you agree? I value opinions, why not tell me what you think below!
Disclosure Policy
Do you need an experienced SEO Consultant or experienced SEO to work on your website? I may be available for hire...
RSS and Email subscription options for this post
Webhostingpad - Site links for yack yack
March 16th, 2008 at 9:04 amNice dude, you done a good job. Even you people search for your keyword yet, I do it now! Cheer!:D
David Airey - Site links for yack yack
March 16th, 2008 at 12:31 pmNice. It seems Google have been implementing site links for a lot more resources recently. Just a couple of days back I noticed a search for ‘David Airey’ shows site links too.
robwatts - Site links for yack yack
March 16th, 2008 at 5:03 pmHi David, good to see you
I just had to see and yes, very cool, its a nice little add on. Your links seem to be a whole lot more useful than mine though, especially the . portfolio, logo design and hire me ones
I’m suspecting that the selection is related to some kind of link metric in combination with a nav metric …no idea for sure. It’s odd why they cut chunks off from the start of titles though, doesn’t appear to make any sense.
@ Webhostingpad…thanks
David Airey - Site links for yack yack
March 16th, 2008 at 6:54 pmI know it’s possible to block certain links from appearing, and you can do so through your Webmaster Tools panel. The addresses you enter will be removed for up to 3 months, which is good if the content highlighted is out of date, or if you’d rather not publicise it.
Matt - Site links for yack yack
March 18th, 2008 at 10:37 pmMy personal blog just got breakout links, but they’re all to individual posts rather than pages on my blog.
Maria Ozawa - Site links for yack yack
March 21st, 2008 at 6:48 amI am just amazed how you made pictures in your blog “embossed”.
soloads - Site links for yack yack
April 29th, 2008 at 7:49 pmSitelinks are a mistery to me.
When I log into my Webmaster Tools account, I see that there are listed more “sitelinks”. When I search for my website (or related keywords) in Google, sitelinks are not there as they are in Webmaster Tools.
In addition, some of the sitelinks are strange - like happened to you too.
For example I publish an ezine “AdsMarket Ezine”. Google’s anchor text for the related sitelink is “Market Ezine” despite the fact that the title of my page is the right one!
Very strange …
Gabbo - Site links for yack yack
May 1st, 2008 at 9:19 amI have been looking to have the same thing for my site. I think it looks very neat and can help get the searcher get where they want fast. But i’m not of how to implement it? Can anyone help?
soloads - Site links for yack yack
May 1st, 2008 at 5:22 pmGabbo,the sitelinks are generated automatically by Google for the sites Google decides. You cannot do anything to get them but to add content to your website and become an authority in your field.
You can read more on sitelinks here:
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=47334&topic=8523
Dave Toys - Site links for yack yack
May 4th, 2008 at 7:46 pmCongratulations. I have notice a lot of site now have the site links. I am still missing out though
Does anyone have any idea how Google choose the link text? I have seen site links going to pages with no link and the site link link text wasn’t the title tag.
soloads - Site links for yack yack
May 4th, 2008 at 8:26 pmDave Toys, the formal response given by Google is the one from my above post
Indeed there are sitelinks texts that are not taken from the title tag - see one of my above posts
John - Site links for yack yack
May 12th, 2008 at 10:13 amCould it be that Google has it’s own mod rewrite rules for some phrases? Bit scarey if Google starts rewriting SEO terms and pretends SEO doesn’t exist as a topic!
Anyone else have any examples of “re-writing”?