<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>SEO's our own worst enemies and Negative SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Search and Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:17:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>SEO's our own worst enemies and Negative SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/comment-page-2/#comment-10129</link>
		<dc:creator>InterNet Age</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2008 11:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/#comment-10129</guid>
		<description>Its Karma, whatever you do will come back to you, or so I believe. It wont ever be me no matter what, but then you get all types of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its Karma, whatever you do will come back to you, or so I believe. It wont ever be me no matter what, but then you get all types of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SEO's our own worst enemies and Negative SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-10100</link>
		<dc:creator>seo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:37:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/#comment-10100</guid>
		<description>I was just telling somebody to quit reporting his competitor because his competitor decided to register a .com version of the same domain and now ranks better. The dude was going crazy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just telling somebody to quit reporting his competitor because his competitor decided to register a .com version of the same domain and now ranks better. The dude was going crazy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SEO's our own worst enemies and Negative SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-10096</link>
		<dc:creator>phil b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 06:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/#comment-10096</guid>
		<description>Is there any evidence that Google even pays attention to this report spam, etc.?  If I were Google I&#039;d stay out of the business of human arbitration, its better to develop code to determine these things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any evidence that Google even pays attention to this report spam, etc.?  If I were Google I&#8217;d stay out of the business of human arbitration, its better to develop code to determine these things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SEO's our own worst enemies and Negative SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-10094</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Hawkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 10:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/#comment-10094</guid>
		<description>until you have to explain to a client why a site like mine lost 400K pages, 90% of it’s traffic without changing anything about it?

That&#039;s link building for you!  Google are constantly trying to hide what their doing with inbound links (and there&#039;s a good reason for that!), I see it every time I link build.  It just shows the very close relation to links and getting ranked in Google.

Google don&#039;t have a personal vendeta against anyone - we all play on a level playing field in that to Google we&#039;re just a  site.  Maybe a good site they love, maybe a bad site they don&#039;t particularly like, but still a site.

Ultimately Google is a search engine it&#039;s not a company and it&#039;s not peoplen.  It&#039;s a massive network of computers that run&#039;s on an algorithm - maths to you and me, a very complicated formula but it&#039;s a formula none the less!

If Google has suddenly decided it doesnt like your site so much anymore then there has to be a reason (in the formula) for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>until you have to explain to a client why a site like mine lost 400K pages, 90% of it’s traffic without changing anything about it?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s link building for you!  Google are constantly trying to hide what their doing with inbound links (and there&#8217;s a good reason for that!), I see it every time I link build.  It just shows the very close relation to links and getting ranked in Google.</p>
<p>Google don&#8217;t have a personal vendeta against anyone &#8211; we all play on a level playing field in that to Google we&#8217;re just a  site.  Maybe a good site they love, maybe a bad site they don&#8217;t particularly like, but still a site.</p>
<p>Ultimately Google is a search engine it&#8217;s not a company and it&#8217;s not peoplen.  It&#8217;s a massive network of computers that run&#8217;s on an algorithm &#8211; maths to you and me, a very complicated formula but it&#8217;s a formula none the less!</p>
<p>If Google has suddenly decided it doesnt like your site so much anymore then there has to be a reason (in the formula) for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>SEO's our own worst enemies and Negative SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-10092</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 09:36:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/negative-seo/seos-our-own-worst-enemies-and-negative-seo/#comment-10092</guid>
		<description>Hey Rob, you have to laugh sometimes.

I enjoy posting here, it&#039;s one of the few blogs that I really have a good look round on and find multiple topics worth a few minutes to contribute to. I don&#039;t consider it to be any part of my SEO activities...however...

Just did my round robin of checking a few stats, factoids and figures and low and behold YackYack is screwing up one of my sites SEO! Brilliant! Actually that&#039;s a compliment to you Rob.  In my Webmastertools, &quot;What Google Sees&quot;, YackYack is all over it like a rash showing how well your blog is indexed. Only trouble is I didn&#039;t use relevant anchor text on my initial post as I didn&#039;t expect to be back here so often. Dooh! Any chance of a little tweak of your MSQL? Now that&#039;s an offer I bet you&#039;ve never had before!

Anyway, either I shall have to go cold turkey on YackYack or I will have to turn into a &quot;DoFollow with anchour text&quot; whore after the next 100 day rollover.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rob, you have to laugh sometimes.</p>
<p>I enjoy posting here, it&#8217;s one of the few blogs that I really have a good look round on and find multiple topics worth a few minutes to contribute to. I don&#8217;t consider it to be any part of my SEO activities&#8230;however&#8230;</p>
<p>Just did my round robin of checking a few stats, factoids and figures and low and behold YackYack is screwing up one of my sites SEO! Brilliant! Actually that&#8217;s a compliment to you Rob.  In my Webmastertools, &#8220;What Google Sees&#8221;, YackYack is all over it like a rash showing how well your blog is indexed. Only trouble is I didn&#8217;t use relevant anchor text on my initial post as I didn&#8217;t expect to be back here so often. Dooh! Any chance of a little tweak of your MSQL? Now that&#8217;s an offer I bet you&#8217;ve never had before!</p>
<p>Anyway, either I shall have to go cold turkey on YackYack or I will have to turn into a &#8220;DoFollow with anchour text&#8221; whore after the next 100 day rollover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
