<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Google Backlinks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/</link>
	<description>A Search Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Google Backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-1617</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/02/07/google-backlinks/#comment-1617</guid>
		<description>Hey Thanks Andy, you&#039;re a great guy.

Don&#039;t forget, if you want...send me the basics and I&#039;ll make a few calls.

Glad I found both these blogs. both credits to the community</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Thanks Andy, you&#8217;re a great guy.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget, if you want&#8230;send me the basics and I&#8217;ll make a few calls.</p>
<p>Glad I found both these blogs. both credits to the community</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google Backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-1616</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/02/07/google-backlinks/#comment-1616</guid>
		<description>Marc I am still going to be writing that SEO review with those few tips we discussed. At lest it will give you one reasonable link, but I wouldn&#039;t worry about the bad links unless that is all you have. I get lots of links from &quot;aggregators&quot; and don&#039;t worry about where content ends up. I even occasionally see some traffic from the splogs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc I am still going to be writing that SEO review with those few tips we discussed. At lest it will give you one reasonable link, but I wouldn&#8217;t worry about the bad links unless that is all you have. I get lots of links from &#8220;aggregators&#8221; and don&#8217;t worry about where content ends up. I even occasionally see some traffic from the splogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google Backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-1615</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/02/07/google-backlinks/#comment-1615</guid>
		<description>LOL interesting as paint drying - I hear you on that one. I love what we do, but the industry as sleazy, competitive and boring as it is makes me wish I was a celebrity columnist at times.

THanks for the input, it is truly appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL interesting as paint drying &#8211; I hear you on that one. I love what we do, but the industry as sleazy, competitive and boring as it is makes me wish I was a celebrity columnist at times.</p>
<p>THanks for the input, it is truly appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google Backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-1614</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2007 17:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/02/07/google-backlinks/#comment-1614</guid>
		<description>Possibly Marc, but i doubt it, its one of those unapprovables. Google used to say things akin to &#039;there isnt anything  a 3rd party can do to negatively affect your site&#039;. That said, it cant really help your link profile if you don&#039;t have any site of authority linking to you, or if you aren&#039;t creating buzz in your niche either (think blogosphere)

I have a site stuck in the doldrums. It has lots of reciprocals and a degree of crappy sites linking to it too. It doesnt rank very well at all. I suspect its because either a)it has some form of manually applied &#039;can&#039;t rank past page 3&#039; penalty b)Its suffering from a) but hasn&#039;t had the benefit of being whitelisted or  c) it just doesnt have enough of the right type of links pointing to it.

A cursory glance at the site in your post suggests that its a  relatively new site in a massively competitive (finance) market place so is really going to have to work hard to get to where you want it to be. A forum and a blog will help, but ultimately you want to be creating interest, getting people to talk about you and what you do for others - IMO therin lies a huge challenge, especially in (for me at least) a marketplace that is about as interesting as paint drying! heh don&#039;t get me wrong i love a £ note too, but only in the sense of spending the things! :D

Good luck with it Mark, thanks for commenting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Possibly Marc, but i doubt it, its one of those unapprovables. Google used to say things akin to &#8216;there isnt anything  a 3rd party can do to negatively affect your site&#8217;. That said, it cant really help your link profile if you don&#8217;t have any site of authority linking to you, or if you aren&#8217;t creating buzz in your niche either (think blogosphere)</p>
<p>I have a site stuck in the doldrums. It has lots of reciprocals and a degree of crappy sites linking to it too. It doesnt rank very well at all. I suspect its because either a)it has some form of manually applied &#8216;can&#8217;t rank past page 3&#8242; penalty b)Its suffering from a) but hasn&#8217;t had the benefit of being whitelisted or  c) it just doesnt have enough of the right type of links pointing to it.</p>
<p>A cursory glance at the site in your post suggests that its a  relatively new site in a massively competitive (finance) market place so is really going to have to work hard to get to where you want it to be. A forum and a blog will help, but ultimately you want to be creating interest, getting people to talk about you and what you do for others &#8211; IMO therin lies a huge challenge, especially in (for me at least) a marketplace that is about as interesting as paint drying! heh don&#8217;t get me wrong i love a £ note too, but only in the sense of spending the things! <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Good luck with it Mark, thanks for commenting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google Backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-1613</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Chase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2007 10:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/02/07/google-backlinks/#comment-1613</guid>
		<description>I just looked at that tool and had a question. A lot of crap sites have linked to me. Don&#039;t know who they are or why they linked to me becuase there is no relevance in our sites. e.g. a dating site, some cheap little watch company etc.

Does that hurt me in the sense that Im being associated with crap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just looked at that tool and had a question. A lot of crap sites have linked to me. Don&#8217;t know who they are or why they linked to me becuase there is no relevance in our sites. e.g. a dating site, some cheap little watch company etc.</p>
<p>Does that hurt me in the sense that Im being associated with crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google Backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 18:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/02/07/google-backlinks/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Well, the problem with the theory is that the policy is a bit of a shifting target.I can&#039;t quite recall the source, but i&#039;m pretty sure i read something akin to an interpretation being,(paraphrasing) &quot;I don&#039;t vouch for this link, its untrusted&quot; which isn&#039;t the same as &quot;I dont vouch for this link dont aply any link juice&quot; take Wikipedia for example, it used to link out to lots of &#039;quality&#039; resources, freely giving link juice etc. Suddenly it decided that these links are no longer trustworthy, its not in a position to vouch for them...for a human edited thing thats kinda sucky.Its akin to saying, hey don&#039;t trust us, we are just a resource of randomly edited content with external links to sides of dubious repute. In other words, these links are not ok for the search engines, but ok for its users.

I know others have reported their nofollows turning up as backlinks too which kinda dilutes any concrete positions.

Bottom line is, they (the SE&#039;s) can choose to do what they like with a link and we will always be playing catch up theorising. I suspect its more a tool for them than a tool for us.

Right, off to look at your generator oversight :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the problem with the theory is that the policy is a bit of a shifting target.I can&#8217;t quite recall the source, but i&#8217;m pretty sure i read something akin to an interpretation being,(paraphrasing) &#8220;I don&#8217;t vouch for this link, its untrusted&#8221; which isn&#8217;t the same as &#8220;I dont vouch for this link dont aply any link juice&#8221; take Wikipedia for example, it used to link out to lots of &#8216;quality&#8217; resources, freely giving link juice etc. Suddenly it decided that these links are no longer trustworthy, its not in a position to vouch for them&#8230;for a human edited thing thats kinda sucky.Its akin to saying, hey don&#8217;t trust us, we are just a resource of randomly edited content with external links to sides of dubious repute. In other words, these links are not ok for the search engines, but ok for its users.</p>
<p>I know others have reported their nofollows turning up as backlinks too which kinda dilutes any concrete positions.</p>
<p>Bottom line is, they (the SE&#8217;s) can choose to do what they like with a link and we will always be playing catch up theorising. I suspect its more a tool for them than a tool for us.</p>
<p>Right, off to look at your generator oversight <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Google Backlinks</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 13:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/02/07/google-backlinks/#comment-202</guid>
		<description>In theory pink box links shouldn&#039;t be on the report

I just spotted a slight oversight on my generator too ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In theory pink box links shouldn&#8217;t be on the report</p>
<p>I just spotted a slight oversight on my generator too <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.yackyack.co.uk/google/google-backlinks/feed/ ) in 0.46422 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 12:43 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 1:43 am UTC -->
