<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/</link>
	<description>A Search Marketing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:09:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/comment-page-1/#comment-7708</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/#comment-7708</guid>
		<description>I agree Markus, it&#039;s a hit and miss affair of striking variation. Too much wiki wiki wiki if you ask me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Markus, it&#8217;s a hit and miss affair of striking variation. Too much wiki wiki wiki if you ask me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/comment-page-1/#comment-7630</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Jalmerot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/#comment-7630</guid>
		<description>Consider Google as the best search engine at the moment. But I must admit that it totally depends on the keywords how good match you get and what time of the day..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider Google as the best search engine at the moment. But I must admit that it totally depends on the keywords how good match you get and what time of the day..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/comment-page-1/#comment-7617</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/#comment-7617</guid>
		<description>Hi Neil thanks for commenting - Absolutely, they do a lot right and so they should, they are well rewarded for it after all ;)

I&#039;m sure they all appreciate being kept on their toes, critical praise can bea good thing. If we didn&#039;t care we wouldn&#039;t make a sound, where would they be then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Neil thanks for commenting &#8211; Absolutely, they do a lot right and so they should, they are well rewarded for it after all <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure they all appreciate being kept on their toes, critical praise can bea good thing. If we didn&#8217;t care we wouldn&#8217;t make a sound, where would they be then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/comment-page-1/#comment-7610</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/#comment-7610</guid>
		<description>Hi David, No I missed it, but I just blogged on it here.

http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/ghosts-in-the-google-machine-and-seeing-double/

thanks for the heads up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David, No I missed it, but I just blogged on it here.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/ghosts-in-the-google-machine-and-seeing-double/" rel="nofollow">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/ghosts-in-the-google-machine-and-seeing-double/</a></p>
<p>thanks for the heads up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/comment-page-1/#comment-7606</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/#comment-7606</guid>
		<description>Did everyone catch the discussion about Google searches being hijacked over the weekend? I reported on it at sciencetext.com following an alert from an independent eye witness. Subsequently, I discovered I&#039;d been scooped by Joe at GoogleWatchdog

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did everyone catch the discussion about Google searches being hijacked over the weekend? I reported on it at sciencetext.com following an alert from an independent eye witness. Subsequently, I discovered I&#8217;d been scooped by Joe at GoogleWatchdog</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/comment-page-1/#comment-7596</link>
		<dc:creator>Acopic Web Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 19:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/#comment-7596</guid>
		<description>Google is great.  Sure it has it&#039;s faults but I still use it for 99% of my searches.  I think people forget that Search Engines have a tough job to do - and the sheer amount of people trying to spam them can&#039;t help what is already a massive task. Yes - link bombing has highlighted a few floors with the algorithm but all in all it&#039;s not that bad is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is great.  Sure it has it&#8217;s faults but I still use it for 99% of my searches.  I think people forget that Search Engines have a tough job to do &#8211; and the sheer amount of people trying to spam them can&#8217;t help what is already a massive task. Yes &#8211; link bombing has highlighted a few floors with the algorithm but all in all it&#8217;s not that bad is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/comment-page-1/#comment-7386</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/#comment-7386</guid>
		<description>No never did...yes patents and patent law, ick! I love those patents that have patented stuff that&#039;s very unlikely to be invented ever!

I can&#039;t think of specifics, but i recall someone somewhere referencing stuff like time machines, teleportation devices, reanimation devices and other &#039;out there&#039; ideas that if invented would simply blow humanity away.

The funny thing with this IR stuff and the big engines especially is that whilst they may well have the time and resources to set up little think tanks and write about scoring methods yet to be conceived, the reality is that just like Googles secret algo, no one outside the inner sanctum really knows exack-tag-alley how it all works and would be none the wiser about the use or tagging on of, any pre-existing patented idea already registered by a competitor.

Of course to think like that suggests that this stuff will stand still. History tends to point to a state of play where something new and radical will come along and blow existing stuff out of the water. 

The IR patent writers of today are either a) trying to freeze out new competition that *may* be a potential threat at some point , or b) just adding to the tried and tested tradition of giving SEO&#039;s a few more FUD theories to think about and speculate upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No never did&#8230;yes patents and patent law, ick! I love those patents that have patented stuff that&#8217;s very unlikely to be invented ever!</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t think of specifics, but i recall someone somewhere referencing stuff like time machines, teleportation devices, reanimation devices and other &#8216;out there&#8217; ideas that if invented would simply blow humanity away.</p>
<p>The funny thing with this IR stuff and the big engines especially is that whilst they may well have the time and resources to set up little think tanks and write about scoring methods yet to be conceived, the reality is that just like Googles secret algo, no one outside the inner sanctum really knows exack-tag-alley how it all works and would be none the wiser about the use or tagging on of, any pre-existing patented idea already registered by a competitor.</p>
<p>Of course to think like that suggests that this stuff will stand still. History tends to point to a state of play where something new and radical will come along and blow existing stuff out of the water. </p>
<p>The IR patent writers of today are either a) trying to freeze out new competition that *may* be a potential threat at some point , or b) just adding to the tried and tested tradition of giving SEO&#8217;s a few more FUD theories to think about and speculate upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Does the Google Algorithm rank pages fairly?</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/comment-page-1/#comment-7385</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/#comment-7385</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s coming Rob, you can be fairly sure. Did you ever used to read Greg Aharonian&#039;s patent news service, it was as looooong ago as the early 90s if memory serves that we collaborated on a couple of items for New Scientist about all the possible permutations of software had been covered at least 10000 times each in supposedly different that all ignored the prior art. This all before high powered searching, pagerank, mp3, mp4, etc etc

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s coming Rob, you can be fairly sure. Did you ever used to read Greg Aharonian&#8217;s patent news service, it was as looooong ago as the early 90s if memory serves that we collaborated on a couple of items for New Scientist about all the possible permutations of software had been covered at least 10000 times each in supposedly different that all ignored the prior art. This all before high powered searching, pagerank, mp3, mp4, etc etc</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.yackyack.co.uk/google/does-the-google-algorithm-rank-pages-fairly/feed/ ) in 0.50877 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 7:59 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 8:59 am UTC -->
