<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Bidvertiser Review (Sponsored)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yackyack.co.uk/blogging/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/blogging/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/</link>
	<description>A Blog about Search and Online</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 06:17:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Bidvertiser Review (Sponsored)</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/blogging/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/comment-page-1/#comment-9970</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 08:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/06/05/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/#comment-9970</guid>
		<description>Not me personally, Jeremy no.

I no longer use it to be honest, and when I did it was for a very short time.

I think it had the making of a good program but (IMO) just didn&#039;t get enough advertisers or publishers on board so up to now at least, has kind of failed in getting up there with the big boys. It certainly has it&#039;s uses though, I just wouldn&#039;t use it for publishing purposes, simply because pound for pound the others that I use give me bigger earning opportunities and outcomes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not me personally, Jeremy no.</p>
<p>I no longer use it to be honest, and when I did it was for a very short time.</p>
<p>I think it had the making of a good program but (IMO) just didn&#8217;t get enough advertisers or publishers on board so up to now at least, has kind of failed in getting up there with the big boys. It certainly has it&#8217;s uses though, I just wouldn&#8217;t use it for publishing purposes, simply because pound for pound the others that I use give me bigger earning opportunities and outcomes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bidvertiser Review (Sponsored)</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/blogging/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/comment-page-1/#comment-9967</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Harkness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 06:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/06/05/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/#comment-9967</guid>
		<description>Hi
Just thought I would ask...
Im using Bidvertizer, and most of the time My site shows the standard &quot;Get $20 Free Advertisement&quot;. I have complained many times but no luck... It seems as though Bidvertizer is stealing my impressions and thus my ad space...

Firstly it is extremely worrying that an ad network would continually show there own ads on a site... it seems dishonest.

Has anyone else experianced this.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Just thought I would ask&#8230;<br />
Im using Bidvertizer, and most of the time My site shows the standard &#8220;Get $20 Free Advertisement&#8221;. I have complained many times but no luck&#8230; It seems as though Bidvertizer is stealing my impressions and thus my ad space&#8230;</p>
<p>Firstly it is extremely worrying that an ad network would continually show there own ads on a site&#8230; it seems dishonest.</p>
<p>Has anyone else experianced this.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bidvertiser Review (Sponsored)</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/blogging/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/comment-page-1/#comment-2394</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 17:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/06/05/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/#comment-2394</guid>
		<description>Cheers Andy, if a jobs worth doing you might as well try and do it properley eh :D

You&#039;ve given me some great examples to aim at, so kudos there bloke. 

They only asked for like 50 words, I gave them 800 odd so I can&#039;t be criticised for effort. ;)

It really seems like they paid a lot more attention to the advertiser backend than the publisher side of things, but I guess that in some respects thats inevitable in the early days. These things are about profit and making money after all. 

I saw the same on those high paying ads too. I think maybe that the upper tier higher spend advertisers might be editorially steered towards certain properties, dependant upon ad budgets and what not. Maybe those bidvertiser peeps will stop on by and clear a few things up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers Andy, if a jobs worth doing you might as well try and do it properley eh <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>You&#8217;ve given me some great examples to aim at, so kudos there bloke. </p>
<p>They only asked for like 50 words, I gave them 800 odd so I can&#8217;t be criticised for effort. <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It really seems like they paid a lot more attention to the advertiser backend than the publisher side of things, but I guess that in some respects thats inevitable in the early days. These things are about profit and making money after all. </p>
<p>I saw the same on those high paying ads too. I think maybe that the upper tier higher spend advertisers might be editorially steered towards certain properties, dependant upon ad budgets and what not. Maybe those bidvertiser peeps will stop on by and clear a few things up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bidvertiser Review (Sponsored)</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/blogging/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/comment-page-1/#comment-2388</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Beard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/06/05/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/#comment-2388</guid>
		<description>Looks like I have some competition on the high quality review front, great stuff :)

I am giving them a full month on the adverts that are running, though for some reason the higher paid ads which are meant to run don&#039;t seem to show up - and it doesn&#039;t seem to be due to Geo-Location.

I did delete a load of adverts on the lower end. I know what the typical payout for a click is for blogging and internet marketing blogs through Adsense, and it the clicks I have achieved with Bidvertiser seem lower.

Sure I could improve positioning for more clicks, but that would be true of any adverts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like I have some competition on the high quality review front, great stuff <img src='http://www.yackyack.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I am giving them a full month on the adverts that are running, though for some reason the higher paid ads which are meant to run don&#8217;t seem to show up &#8211; and it doesn&#8217;t seem to be due to Geo-Location.</p>
<p>I did delete a load of adverts on the lower end. I know what the typical payout for a click is for blogging and internet marketing blogs through Adsense, and it the clicks I have achieved with Bidvertiser seem lower.</p>
<p>Sure I could improve positioning for more clicks, but that would be true of any adverts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bidvertiser Review (Sponsored)</title>
		<link>http://www.yackyack.co.uk/blogging/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/comment-page-1/#comment-2376</link>
		<dc:creator>robwatts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 10:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yackyack.co.uk/2007/06/05/bidvertiser-review-sponsored/#comment-2376</guid>
		<description>Hey Lyndon, thanks for the kind words dude.

To be honest I haven&#039;t really looked too much into the review post thing. I only recently put up a badge or two here and there.

I&#039;m not one for wasting my time talking about stuff that I&#039;m not really interested in so, I guess you wont really find me taking on board, &quot;8 quid postive review required we just want a link&quot; type gigs. 

So yeah, if I do a review on something then at worst Ive got a genuine interest in what it is they do or who they are and what they can bring to my little world. 

I won&#039;t do a review that demands a positive spin because thats kinda crappy and valueless really. It&#039;s almost akin to  lying about a thing, just because some mother paid you to write it. I just aint gonna do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Lyndon, thanks for the kind words dude.</p>
<p>To be honest I haven&#8217;t really looked too much into the review post thing. I only recently put up a badge or two here and there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not one for wasting my time talking about stuff that I&#8217;m not really interested in so, I guess you wont really find me taking on board, &#8220;8 quid postive review required we just want a link&#8221; type gigs. </p>
<p>So yeah, if I do a review on something then at worst Ive got a genuine interest in what it is they do or who they are and what they can bring to my little world. </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t do a review that demands a positive spin because thats kinda crappy and valueless really. It&#8217;s almost akin to  lying about a thing, just because some mother paid you to write it. I just aint gonna do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
